June 15 - 18, 2020
Detroit, USA
Conference Day 2
8:30 - 9:00
Registration and Welcome Tea or Coffee
9:00 - 9:10
Opening Remarks by the conference chairperson
9:10 - 9:50
Working with the 2nd edition of ISO 26262
- Streamline design processes
- Verification and validation methodologies affected
9:50 - 10:30
An integrative approach towards SOTIF and FuSa
- SOTIF poses new challenges in comparison to ISO 26262 FuSa, because it’s not about failure, but about natural limits and weaknesses, that manifest themselves depending on the situation
- First draft of new SOTIF Standard ISO 21448 appeared this year, internal work going on towards higher automation levels, with more concrete advices on SOTIF analyses
- Automotive companies are fearing lots of different or even duplicated work to do for SOTIF, but there is potential to do a lot of things in sync with ISO 26262 activties
In most companies, SOTIF analysts and verification/simulation people are not yet working together – but there will need to be a bridge between both disciplines, as they can only succeed when collaborating
Sponsored by: ANSYS, Inc.
10:30 - 11:00
Refreshment break and networking
11:00 - 11:40
The challenges of bringing autonomous driving development to production
• The safety-related challenges that delay the production readiness of autonomous driving
• How different players in the industry are gauging roadworthiness of autonomous driving
• A proposal on how to address these challenges in a balanced manner
Tamás Csizmadia, Head of Safety and Compliance,
AImotive Ltd
11:40 - 12:20
Panel Discussion: How much of a software engineer do future functional safety experts have to be?
- Electrified elements need data expertise, SW skills as well as HW skills
- Even critical safety functions are more and more affected by ECUs communicating with one another
- Recent autonomous driving incidents highlight the importance of understanding how and when what system overrides another
12:20 - 13:50
Networking luncheon
13:50 - 14:30
Automotive Functional Safety ISO 26262 - Hardware evaluation methodologies
- Evaluation of Safety Goal violation due to random hardware failures
- Evaluation of hardware architectural metrics compiled by ISO 26262 - SPFM, LFM
- Gap analysis for different ASIL levels by metric evaluation
14:30 - 15:10
Assuring Functional Safety in Level 4 AV using Systematic Fault Monitoring
- -FuSa perspective on AV Level 1-5
- -Introduction to systematic monitoring of AV risk
- -Comparison to other safety monitors
- -Measuring safety in AV detection of “ODD cushion
15:10 - 15:40
Referesment break and networking
Interactive Discussion Groups
Table 1
15:40 - 16:50 Battery System Safety meets ISO26262, including End-to-end ProtectionTable 2
15:40 - 16:50 The validation of adaptive controls. New product through life usage.e: safety vs. availability
Table 3
15:40 - 16:50 open scenario simulation testing – how much is enough?(Find the topic of your choice and have an engaging solution-oriented discussion with your peers. After 30min you can choose another topic.)
